Last month we profiled the Federal Circuit’s Metcalf Constr. decision about the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing. This month we published an in-depth article (i) analyzing the recent evolution of this implied duty and (ii) discussing the standard a contractor now must demonstrate to prove the Government’s breach of the duty. Importantly, the Metalf Constr. decision solidifies the “reasonableness” standard for proving breach, and clarifies that the much tougher “specific targeting” standard (announced in the Federal Circuit’s 2010 Precision Pine decision) only will be used in limited circumstances. Although some questions remain about the application of the “specific targeting” standard, Metcalf Constr. clearly is a win for contractors.
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a326a/a326a0807f804f8895cb0663b8eb56dea0760153" alt="Dentons Government Contracts Group"
About Dentons Government Contracts Group
Operating at the intersection of law, business and government, the Dentons’ Government Contracts practice delivers creative, flexible and effective business and litigation solutions and strategies, relying not only on our breadth and depth of experience, but also on our proven history of succeeding in the most complex and difficult circumstances.
RELATED POSTS
Webinar Recording: 2016 Presidential and Congressional Elections: Impacts on DoD’s Technology Innovation Initiative
Guarding The Privilege: Fourth Circuit Reverses District Court Decision Finding Disclosure Pursuant to the Mandatory Disclosure Rule Waived Attorney-Client Privilege
By
Phillip Seckman and Joe Martinez